|
Twitter
|
Facebook
|
Google+
|
VKontakte
|
LinkedIn
|
Viadeo
|
English
|
Français
|
Español
|
العربية
|
 
International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies
ISSN: 2028-9324     CODEN: IJIABO     OCLC Number: 828807274     ZDB-ID: 2703985-7
 
 
Tuesday 05 July 2022

About IJIAS

News

Submission

Downloads

Archives

Custom Search

Contact

  • Contact us
  • Newsletter:

Connect with IJIAS

  Now IJIAS is indexed in EBSCO, ResearchGate, ProQuest, Chemical Abstracts Service, Index Copernicus, IET Inspec Direct, Ulrichs Web, Google Scholar, CAS Abstracts, J-Gate, UDL Library, CiteSeerX, WorldCat, Scirus, Research Bible and getCited, etc.  
 
 
 

Comparative analysis of hybrid controllers of done systems (UPFC) and interphase power regulators type RPI 30P15 on contingency management in electrical networks


[ Analyse comparée des contrôleurs hybrides des systèmes FACTS (UPFC) et des régulateurs de puissance interphases type RPI 30P15 sur la gestion des contingences en réseaux électriques ]

Volume 33, Issue 2, July 2021, Pages 354–371

 Comparative analysis of hybrid controllers of done systems (UPFC) and interphase power regulators type RPI 30P15 on contingency management in electrical networks

KOKO KOKO Joseph1, NNEME NNEME Léandre2, NDJAKOMO ESSIANE Salomé3, and BATASSOU GUILZIA Jeannot4

1 Laboratory of Computer and Automatic Engineering, UFD of Engineering Sciences. ENSET, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
2 Laboratory of Computer and Automatic Engineering, UFD of Engineering Sciences. ENSET, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
3 Higher Normal School of Technical Education ENSET of EBOLOWA, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon
4 Laboratory of Computer and Automatic Engineering, UFD of Engineering Sciences. ENSET, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon

Original language: French

Copyright © 2021 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract


The aim of this work is to demonstrate that interphase power regulators (IPR) bring new and interesting ultra-solutions that complement those already taken into account by the FACTS (Flexible Alternative Transmission System) in the resolution of the problems related to the power flow in the AC transmission networks. In order to facilitate the understanding of this work, a comparative study of the performances of the two technologies between the UPFC (Unified Power Flow Controller) and RPI was carried out and at the end of which we were able to highlight the preponderance of RPI compared to the UPFC in the bypassing of the short-circuit fault insofar as the latter allows, in particular, an increase in the transformation capacity without an increase in the level of the short-circuit. The decoupled watt-var method has been used to control the UPFC while the RPI is controlled by phase shift. The simulation results are obtained in the Matlab Simulink environment and show the flexibility of the RPI compared to the UPFC in limiting strong contingencies.

Author Keywords: Transmission line, High Contingency, FACTS, PST, TCPST, UPFC, Three-leg RPI 30P15, Phase-shifting transformer, Modeling.


Abstract: (french)


Ce travail a pour but de démontrer que les régulateurs de puissance interphases (RPI) apportent des solutions ultras nouvelles et intéressantes qui viennent en complément de ceux déjà pris en compte par les systèmes FACTS (Flexible Alternative Transmission System) dans la résolution des problèmes liés à l’écoulement de puissances dans les réseaux de transport en courant alternatif. Afin faciliter la compréhension de ce travail, une étude comparative des performances des deux technologies entre l’UPFC (Unifie Power Flow Controller) et RPI a été ressortie et à l’issue de laquelle nous avons pu ressortir la prépondérance du RPI par rapport à l’UPFC dans le contournement du défaut de court-circuit ceci dans la mesure où ce dernier permet notamment : l'accroissement de la capacité de transformation sans augmentation du niveau de court-circuit. La méthode watt-var découplée a été utilisée pour la commande de L’UPFC tandis que le RPI est commandé par variation de déphasage. Les résultats de simulation sont obtenus dans l’environnement Matlab Simulink et témoignent de la flexibilité du RPI par rapport à l’UPFC dans la limitation de fortes contingences.

Author Keywords: Ligne de transport d’énergie , Fortes Contingences , FACTS , PST , TCPST , UPFC , RPI 30P15 à trois branches , Transformateur déphaseur , Modélisation.


How to Cite this Article


KOKO KOKO Joseph, NNEME NNEME Léandre, NDJAKOMO ESSIANE Salomé, and BATASSOU GUILZIA Jeannot, “Comparative analysis of hybrid controllers of done systems (UPFC) and interphase power regulators type RPI 30P15 on contingency management in electrical networks,” International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 354–371, July 2021.