The great debate and the big argumentative elevated by the matter of recognition of the existence or not of the African Philosophy justify a systematical analysis of African thoughts to quarry the philosophical ingredients. In fact, for many African pessimists, it was unthinkable to consider an African ideology. Many prejudices have been advanced for that goal supporting the mental inability of niggers. Here, we can mention that the major marks the « pre-logism» of Levy Brühl confirming that the negroes have a pre-logical mentality. Hegel, denies all the history, every movement and development to Africa testifying that all happened in Africa highlights from Asian and European world. Towards this african reification, it becomes imperative to wonder if Africa has got real ideologies, their matters, and perspectives. This is the task on which harness different authors of this section thus the major intention is to bring up the readers discover the great African ideologies and their contributions in the history of african thought in particular and in the universal thought in general.

In the Italy devastated by occupational wars imposed by strangers, Machiavel felt called upon decides to give a donation to Prince Laurent de Medicis which would allow him to take thecountry in this chaotic situation. The gift was a collection of Machiavel’s experiences presented in the «Prince» in a form of a Prince’s code of laws or conduct. We was interested in this unpretentious scientific research due to duties assigned to «Prince» by Machiavel in the «Prince», a well-known work by intellectuals and which has become paramount book for politicians. This feat works encloses principal duties such as: duties towards people, duty of being feared but not blamed and the duty of speech which does not break down the power. Machiavel sermonize realistic and practical politics which considers humans not as they should be, but as they are: wicked, envious...he does not sermonize cruelty, avariciousness, etc. to avoid social nuisance. However, he wants to show the possibility for the leader to do evil in order to overcome and maintain territorial integrity, but also the social welfare, going against blind and fierce cruelty which ruins the «Prince». Also, Machiavel substitutes politics for moral while it is the moral which serves politics. It is against such a practice of doing things that the writers attempts to give warming to their readers through this scientific research understudy, because nowadays, many leaders practice this hypocritical politic sermonized by Machiavel.