[ Proximité géographique et analyse des externalités sectorielles dans l'économie française: Etude de cas ]
Volume 12, Issue 2, July 2015, Pages 462–470
Ahmed Lakssissar1
1 Université Paul Cézanne - Aix-Marseille III, Faculté d'Economie Appliquée, Centre d'analyse économique, 13628 Aix-en-Provence Cedex 14, France
Original language: French
Copyright © 2015 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
A large number of work theoretical and empirical confirms the geographical dimension of externalities of the research development. However these works suffers from two major weaknesses. On the one hand, they are limited to the American case and generalize the results with other contexts (essentially european). On the other hand, in front of difficulties bound to the modeling, rare are works which includes in the same model the externalities and their geographical dimension. We exploited these gaps related to these two weaknesses works about it on a european country (France) while integrating in the same model the externalities of the research and development and their geographical dimension.
Author Keywords: geographical proximity, specialization, diversity and externalities.
Volume 12, Issue 2, July 2015, Pages 462–470
Ahmed Lakssissar1
1 Université Paul Cézanne - Aix-Marseille III, Faculté d'Economie Appliquée, Centre d'analyse économique, 13628 Aix-en-Provence Cedex 14, France
Original language: French
Copyright © 2015 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
A large number of work theoretical and empirical confirms the geographical dimension of externalities of the research development. However these works suffers from two major weaknesses. On the one hand, they are limited to the American case and generalize the results with other contexts (essentially european). On the other hand, in front of difficulties bound to the modeling, rare are works which includes in the same model the externalities and their geographical dimension. We exploited these gaps related to these two weaknesses works about it on a european country (France) while integrating in the same model the externalities of the research and development and their geographical dimension.
Author Keywords: geographical proximity, specialization, diversity and externalities.
Abstract: (french)
Un grand nombre de travaux théoriques et empiriques confirment la dimension géographique des externalités de la recherche et développement. Cependant, ces travaux souffrent de deux faiblesses majeures. D'une part, ils se limitent au cas américain et généralisent les résultats à d'autres contextes (essentiellement européens). D'autre part, face aux difficultés liées à la modélisation, rares sont les travaux qui incluent dans le même modèle les externalités et leur dimension géographique. Nous avons exploité ces lacunes liées à ces deux faiblesses en travaillons sur un pays européen (la France) tout en intégrant dans un même modèle les externalités de la recherche et développement et leur dimension géographique.
Author Keywords: proximité géographique, spécialisation, diversité et externalités.
How to Cite this Article
Ahmed Lakssissar, “Geographical proximity and analysis of the sectoral externalities in the French economy: Case study,” International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 462–470, July 2015.
