The relationship between the western private international law and the institutions of the Islamic law constitutes a marked out course of tensions and more than one half-century of jurisprudence did not succeed in alleviating them. The study of the relations of the private international law deprived between the Muslim legal systems and the Quebec legal system illustrates the difficulties between the systems when the involved civilizations appear very different. Consequently, the great difference between the Muslim civilization and the Quebec civilization invite to seek a better coordination between these legal systems in order to achieve the objectives of private international law. In this research, one can only deplore the existence of two designs which are opposed today in the relations of the Muslim legal system: that of the laic right and that of the religious right. It is indeed the main obstacle to the reception of the Muslim personal status in Quebec. By analyzing this last point of the reception of the institutions of the Islamic right in Quebec it proved that the Quebec law enjoys a supremacy compared to the foreign law as regards personal status of the Muslims established in Quebec. This is explained by the desire to protect the cohesion of the national legal system. However, can this concern go until blaming the international harmony of the solutions? In Muslim countries, the private international law situation is not better than that of Quebec. Despite the creation of states in the modern sense of the term and the adoption of the Nationality factor, the private international law of Muslim countries remains always a system of privileges. The practice reveals that the solutions adopted today are still captive of the privilege of religion and the privilege of nationality. However, we are persuaded that the reasoning adopted by the two legal orders can only aggravate the problems of the private international law raised by the presence of a Muslim community in Quebec and in no case reconcile the goals of the private international law. Such a statement has prompted us to look for other solutions that can replace the classical method. Several solutions have been proposed including autonomy of the will.

If the reports of international private law between Muslim legal systems and the Occident system have revealed due to the underlying conflict of norms the limited reception of Muslim personal status in Occident. We are convinced that neither the adoption of the domicile factor of international Occident private law nor the adoption of the factor of nationality in Muslim international private law can mitigate the problems of international private law raised by the Muslim's immigration in Occident. In other words, the traditional bilateral conflict rule is not able to reconcile the objectives of international private law of internal tendency and those of international tendency. It has also failed to adopt a pluralistic and private vision well adapted to new paradigms that dominate the world in the 21st century (pluralism multiculturalism, globalism and the computer revolution). In another hand, the advantages of the recognition method has resulted not only from its adapting to these new paradigms, but also the analysis in our research indicate that the application of this method on Muslims personal status in the Occident responds to real needs, namely the continuity of treatment of legal situations without breaking the cohesion and coherence of the internal system. The reason why we promote the recognition method.