[ Utilisation des plantes insecticides dans la lutte contre la mouche de haricot commun (Genre: Ophiomyia) à l’Est de la République Démocratique du Congo ]
Volume 24, Issue 1, August 2018, Pages 255–268
Oswald Koleramungu Cimanuka1, Telesphore MIRINDI CIRHUZA2, N. Rudahaba3, Jean Louis BAHIZIRE KAYEYE4, Y.M. Amani5, J. Ntamwira6, B. Bukomarhe7, E. Mongana8, B. Tuombemungu9, Munganga wa Muhwanjo10, and N. R. Kijana11
1 Programme National Légumineuse, Section Défense des Végétaux, Laboratoire de Phytopathologie, Institut National pour l'Etude et la Recherche Agronomique de Mulungu, Sud-Kivu, Bukavu, RD Congo
2 Section amélioration des cultures, Institut National pour l’Etude et Recherche Agronomique de Mulungu, RD Congo
3 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
4 Département de Biologie, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles, RD Congo
5 Centre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles de Lwiro (CRSN/Lwiro), Département de Biologie, RD Congo
6 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
7 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
8 Mulungu Research Station, Institut National d'Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques, INERA, P.O. Box 2037 Kinshasa 1, Av. de Cliniques, Kinshasa-Gombe, Bukavu, Sud Kivu, RD Congo
9 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
10 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
11 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
Original language: French
Copyright © 2018 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
With the aim of finding biodegradable organic substances that are not harmful to humans and that do not pollute the environment, that are effective against the fly and alternatives to synthetic pesticides polluting the environment, a test of the insecticidal activity of Tephrosia vogelii, Tetradenia ruparia and Tithonia diversifolia was carried out in the presence of the synthetic pesticides (Thiodan) and the control. Indeed, the results obtained are as follows: During the two cropping seasons, at stages V3-V4 and r6, the variety V2 / Rwr2254 is the most susceptible to attack by the common bean fly; When treated with insecticide plants and the synthetic insecticide, thiodan, we found that there were fewer pupae on common bean plants treated with the insecticide plant Tephrosia vogelii and thiodan, followed by the lethal dose (Dl 90) of each insecticide plant. For the 2 cropping seasons, the plot yield in gram shows that the variety V1 / HM 21-7 gave the high yield; the plant Tephrosia vogelii yielded a high yield and compared to treatments, thiodan provided high yield and The extrapolated yield in kilograms per hectare still shows that the variety V1 / HM21-7 is the one that gave a high yield, the insecticide plant Tephrosia vogelii is the one that gave a high yield and the thiodan is the treatment that gave high efficiency. Thus, the use of these insecticidal plants is an alternative for managing the bean fly for improving common bean productivity.
Author Keywords: Common bean, common bean fly, insecticide plants, variety, treatment, yield.
Volume 24, Issue 1, August 2018, Pages 255–268
Oswald Koleramungu Cimanuka1, Telesphore MIRINDI CIRHUZA2, N. Rudahaba3, Jean Louis BAHIZIRE KAYEYE4, Y.M. Amani5, J. Ntamwira6, B. Bukomarhe7, E. Mongana8, B. Tuombemungu9, Munganga wa Muhwanjo10, and N. R. Kijana11
1 Programme National Légumineuse, Section Défense des Végétaux, Laboratoire de Phytopathologie, Institut National pour l'Etude et la Recherche Agronomique de Mulungu, Sud-Kivu, Bukavu, RD Congo
2 Section amélioration des cultures, Institut National pour l’Etude et Recherche Agronomique de Mulungu, RD Congo
3 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
4 Département de Biologie, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles, RD Congo
5 Centre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles de Lwiro (CRSN/Lwiro), Département de Biologie, RD Congo
6 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
7 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
8 Mulungu Research Station, Institut National d'Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques, INERA, P.O. Box 2037 Kinshasa 1, Av. de Cliniques, Kinshasa-Gombe, Bukavu, Sud Kivu, RD Congo
9 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
10 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
11 Institut National d’Etude et de Recherche Agronomiques de Mulungu (INERA/Mulungu), RD Congo
Original language: French
Copyright © 2018 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
With the aim of finding biodegradable organic substances that are not harmful to humans and that do not pollute the environment, that are effective against the fly and alternatives to synthetic pesticides polluting the environment, a test of the insecticidal activity of Tephrosia vogelii, Tetradenia ruparia and Tithonia diversifolia was carried out in the presence of the synthetic pesticides (Thiodan) and the control. Indeed, the results obtained are as follows: During the two cropping seasons, at stages V3-V4 and r6, the variety V2 / Rwr2254 is the most susceptible to attack by the common bean fly; When treated with insecticide plants and the synthetic insecticide, thiodan, we found that there were fewer pupae on common bean plants treated with the insecticide plant Tephrosia vogelii and thiodan, followed by the lethal dose (Dl 90) of each insecticide plant. For the 2 cropping seasons, the plot yield in gram shows that the variety V1 / HM 21-7 gave the high yield; the plant Tephrosia vogelii yielded a high yield and compared to treatments, thiodan provided high yield and The extrapolated yield in kilograms per hectare still shows that the variety V1 / HM21-7 is the one that gave a high yield, the insecticide plant Tephrosia vogelii is the one that gave a high yield and the thiodan is the treatment that gave high efficiency. Thus, the use of these insecticidal plants is an alternative for managing the bean fly for improving common bean productivity.
Author Keywords: Common bean, common bean fly, insecticide plants, variety, treatment, yield.
Abstract: (french)
Dans l’objectif de trouver des substances organiques insecticides biodégradables, non nocifs à l’homme et ne polluant pas l’environnement, efficaces contre la mouche et alternatives aux pesticides synthétiques pollueurs de l’environnement, un test de l’activité insecticide des Tephrosia vogelii, Tetradenia ruparia et Tithonia diversifolia a été réalisé en présence des pesticides de synthèse (Thiodan) et le témoin. En effet, les résultats obtenus sont les suivants: Durant les 2 campagnes culturales, aux stades V3-V4 et r6, la variété V2/Rwr2254 est la plus sensible à l’attaque par la mouche de haricot commun; Lors du traitement par les plantes insecticides et l’insecticide synthétique, thiodan, nous avons constatons qu’il ya moins de pupes sur les plants de haricot commun traités par la plante insecticide Tephrosia vogelii et le thiodan, suivi de la dose létale (Dl 90) de chaque plante insecticide. Pour les 2 campagnes culturales, le rendement parcellaire en gramme montre que la variété V1/HM 21-7 a donné le rendement élevé; la plante Tephrosia vogelii a permis d’obtenir un rendement élevé et par rapport aux traitements, le thiodan a fourni le rendement élevé; Le rendement extrapolé en kilogramme à l’hectare montre toujours que la variété V1/HM21-7 est celle qui a donné un rendement élevé, la plante insecticide Tephrosia vogelii est celle qui a donné un rendement élevé et le thiodan est le traitement qui a donné le rendement élevé. Ainsi, l’utilisation de ces plantes insecticides est une alternative pour la gestion de la mouche de haricot pour l’amélioration de la productivité de haricot commun.
Author Keywords: Haricot commun, mouche de haricot commun, plantes insecticides, variété, traitement, rendement.
How to Cite this Article
Oswald Koleramungu Cimanuka, Telesphore MIRINDI CIRHUZA, N. Rudahaba, Jean Louis BAHIZIRE KAYEYE, Y.M. Amani, J. Ntamwira, B. Bukomarhe, E. Mongana, B. Tuombemungu, Munganga wa Muhwanjo, and N. R. Kijana, “Use of insecticide plants in the fight against common bean fly (Genus: Ophiomyia) at the East of the Democratic Republic of Congo,” International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 255–268, August 2018.
