[ Encadrement des étudiants pendant les enseignements pratiques de l’Institut Supérieur des Techniques Médicales de Gemena en RDC: De 2019 à 2021 ]
Volume 37, Issue 4, October 2022, Pages 861–873
Daniel Matili Widobana1
1 Institut Supérieur des Techniques Médicales de Gemena, RD Congo
Original language: French
Copyright © 2022 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
It is important for us to present a Abstract of this research. We started from an observation of the decline in productivity in the supervision of students; insufficient training of course teachers in terms of planning - monitoring - supervision - supervision and evaluation of courses; insufficient supervision both by field supervisors and by teachers of theoretical courses; the low level of involvement of the Sections in the process of planning and carrying out the courses; the plethoric number of students in institutions which makes supervision difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the practical teaching of students on the quality of internship supervision at ISTM-Gemena. We used the survey method, supported by the technique of self-administered questionnaire for the socio-professional characteristics of the respondents, based on the supervision of the students during the practical lessons, to collect data on the variables of the study, namely: pedagogical training, supervision methodology, tools or modules, teaching materials, preparation, supervision, monitoring and evaluation and supervision. Through this study, it turned out that the degree of application of teachers during supervision and practical lessons would be low firstly because of the level of pedagogical training, the preparation of the subjects to be taught which are improvised, poor supervision methodology, no follow-up and supervision of students in the field by ISTM-Gemena supervisors, absence of some didactic supervision materials, demotivation of teachers. Indeed, the results of the present study do not reveal any statistically significant difference between the different distributions according to the socio-professional characteristics observed and the supervision of the students during the practical lessons shown by the survey subjects during the practical lessons. Of all the above, we say that all hypotheses are confirmed.
Author Keywords: supervision, student, teaching, practice, Gemena, DRC.
Volume 37, Issue 4, October 2022, Pages 861–873
Daniel Matili Widobana1
1 Institut Supérieur des Techniques Médicales de Gemena, RD Congo
Original language: French
Copyright © 2022 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
It is important for us to present a Abstract of this research. We started from an observation of the decline in productivity in the supervision of students; insufficient training of course teachers in terms of planning - monitoring - supervision - supervision and evaluation of courses; insufficient supervision both by field supervisors and by teachers of theoretical courses; the low level of involvement of the Sections in the process of planning and carrying out the courses; the plethoric number of students in institutions which makes supervision difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the practical teaching of students on the quality of internship supervision at ISTM-Gemena. We used the survey method, supported by the technique of self-administered questionnaire for the socio-professional characteristics of the respondents, based on the supervision of the students during the practical lessons, to collect data on the variables of the study, namely: pedagogical training, supervision methodology, tools or modules, teaching materials, preparation, supervision, monitoring and evaluation and supervision. Through this study, it turned out that the degree of application of teachers during supervision and practical lessons would be low firstly because of the level of pedagogical training, the preparation of the subjects to be taught which are improvised, poor supervision methodology, no follow-up and supervision of students in the field by ISTM-Gemena supervisors, absence of some didactic supervision materials, demotivation of teachers. Indeed, the results of the present study do not reveal any statistically significant difference between the different distributions according to the socio-professional characteristics observed and the supervision of the students during the practical lessons shown by the survey subjects during the practical lessons. Of all the above, we say that all hypotheses are confirmed.
Author Keywords: supervision, student, teaching, practice, Gemena, DRC.
Abstract: (french)
Il s’avère important pour nous de présenter un résumé de cette recherche. Nous sommes parti d’un constat de la baisse de la productivité dans l’encadrement des étudiants; l'insuffisance de formation des enseignants de stage en matière de planification - suivis - supervision - encadrement et évaluation des stages; l'insuffisance d'encadrement tant par les encadreurs de terrain que par les enseignants de cours théoriques; le faible niveau d'implication des Sections dans le processus de planification et exécution des stages; l’effectif pléthorique des étudiants dans des institutions ce qui rend l’encadrement difficile. Cette étude avait pour but d’évaluer l’enseignement pratique des étudiants sur la qualité de l’encadrement de stage à l’ISTM-Gemena. Nous avons recouru à la méthode d’enquête, soutenue par la technique de questionnaire auto-administré pour les caractéristiques socioprofessionnelles des enquêtés, basé sur l’encadrement des étudiants pendant les enseignements pratiques, pour recueillir les données sur les variables de l’étude, à savoir: formation pédagogique, la méthodologie d’encadrement, les outils ou module, les matériels didactiques, préparation, encadrement suivi- évaluation et supervision. Par cette étude, il s’est avéré que le degré d’application des enseignants lors d’encadrement et des enseignements pratiques seraient faible d’abord à cause du niveau de la formation pédagogique, de la préparation des matières à enseigner qui sont improvisés, la mauvaise méthodologie d’encadrements, pas de suivi et supervision des étudiants sur terrain par les encadreurs de l’ISTM-Gemena, absences des quelques matériels didactiques d’encadrement, la démotivation des enseignants. En effet Les résultats de la présente étude ne révèlent aucune différence statistiquement significative entre les différentes répartitions selon les caractéristiques socioprofessionnelles observées et l’encadrement des étudiants lors des enseignements pratiques manifestés par les sujets d’enquête lors des enseignements pratiques. De tout ce qui précède, nous disons que toutes les hypothèses sont confirmées.
Author Keywords: encadrement, étudiant, enseignement, pratique, Gemena, RDC.
How to Cite this Article
Daniel Matili Widobana, “Supervision of students during the practical lessons of the higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Gemena in DRC: From 2019 to 2021,” International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 861–873, October 2022.
