We do not claim to have exhausted everything in this area. We could write everything but we have limited ourselves to what you have in your hands so that you too can continue with research in this matter. Our ambition was to unseal the main motivating factors of the academic and scientific staff of ISTM-Gemena. To carry out this study, we used quantitative descriptive methods and documentary and interview techniques which led us to this result. The reality of the Democratic Republic of Congo has always shown that the staff is not well paid and motivated, hence the teachers of higher institutes and universities always seek to accumulate in order to live well. To the men of science, after reading this work, you would be able to carry out investigations in this field to bring to light all that is hidden in State Societies, your systematic search also proves to be essential for the future of our scientific environment. Thus, the result of our research confirmed the initial hypothesis that academic and scientific staff are motivated. The motivating factors of the Staff are more of social orders whereas the motivation of economic orders does not turn out to be necessary for an academic and scientific staff. This is why all the academic and scientific staff are cumulative. We encourage what ISTM-Gemena is doing but we ask them to improve and add other ingredients and condiments to make the sauce even better, because the man is an eternal dissatisfied. On the whole, all the factors analyzed in the results interpretation table are not all motivational like economic factors. However, it should be noted that those that are more motivational are the work of the teachers themselves, advancement in grade, performance bonuses, responsibility and freedom granted to work, interpersonal relations, communication with colleagues, management. participant, the assignments of the courses, the recognition of the efforts made and of the merit insofar as these factors are global and not specific.